Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010130232026 2026:GAU-AS:10082 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1450/2026 SRI PANKAJ RAVA AND 2 ORS S/O LATE DWIJEN RAVA, R/O- PUB-SHANTINAGAR, KAHILIPARA, CHILARAI PATH, P.O. KAHILIPARA, P.S. DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN 781019 2: SMTI KANIKA RAVA W/O LATE DWIJEN RAVA R/O PUB SHANTINAGAR KAHILIPARA CHILARAI PATH PO KAHILIPARA PS DISPUR DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN 781019 3: SRI TUTU RABHA @ MINTU RABHA S/O LATE DWIJEN RAVA R/O PUB SHANTINAGAR KAHILIPARA CHILARAI PATH PO KAHILIPARA PS DISPUR DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN 78101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINHA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 22.07.2026 Heard Mr. S.K. Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused- applicants. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State of Assam. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 388/2026, registered under Sections 85/89/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. An FIR dated 14.06.2026 was lodged by the wife of the accused applicant no. 1, stating that she was married to the accused applicant no. 1 on 22.01.2026. It was alleged that subsequently she got pregnant, but petitioner no. 1 refused to take responsibility and after taking her to Aruna Memorial Hospital, administered medicine which led to her miscarriage. There are certain allegations against the brother of the accused applicant no. 1 and mother-in-law as well. 4. The coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 26.06.2026 granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused applicant no. 3. 5. The Case Diary in the instant case has been received, and the same is perused. 6. Taking into account the entire facts of the case and statements made before the Investigating Officer, this Court is prima facie of the opinion that the accused applicants should be granted anticipatory pre-arrest bail. Page No.# 3/3 7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused applicant nos. 1 and 2, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the condition that the accused applicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of 10 days from today and also cooperate with the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 8. In respect of accused applicant no. 3, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused applicant no. 3 is made absolute. 9. In terms of the above directions, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant