[2026:RJ-JP:29391] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13502/2026 CNR: RJHC020704162026 | URN: CW / 29531U / 2026 1. Gopi Chand Sharma S/o Shri Lakhmi Chand, Aged About 59 Years, R/o B-232, Naradpura, Amer-Kunda, Jaipur (Rajasthan) And Presently Working As Driver, R.s.r.d.c. Jaipur Depot, Jaipur. 2. Leeladhar Sharma S/o Shri Lakhmi Chand, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 98, Ward No.25, Near Collector Kothi, Sanjay Nagar, Bharatpur (Rajashan) And Presently Working As Driver, R.s.r.d.c. Jaipur Depot, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman And Managing Director. 2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Depot, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/07/2026 1. Mr. Laxmikant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would feel satisfied, if the respondent- Corporation is directed to consider petitioners’ representation in light of the Judgment dated 02.12.2021 rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 524/2018 [2026:RJ-JP:29391] (2 of 2) [CW-13502/2026] (The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs. Tara Chand), expeditiously in accordance with law. 2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to address a representation before the Competent Authority of the respondent-Corporation along with web copy of the judgment dated 02.12.2021 rendered in case of Tara Chand (supra) and the certified copy of the order instant within a period of four weeks. 3. In case, the representation is so addressed, the Competent Authority shall consider the same in accordance with law including the judgment passed in case of Tara Chand (supra), as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the receipt thereof. 4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly. 6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition. The respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the relief. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 19/ARTI SHARMA