[2026:RJ-JP:29553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15947/2019 CNR: RJHC020731722019 | URN: CW / 29707U / 2019 Dr. Devi Shankar Nagar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Nagar, Aged About 43 Years, Village Kanwarpura Post- Musen Gujran Tehsil - Atru Distt. Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family- Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora Ms. Aditi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/07/2026 1. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is considered for final disposal at this stage only. 2. While placing reliance upon the judgment in the case of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18268/2016) and connected matters decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.03.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res-integra as the same has already been decided by this [2026:RJ-JP:29553] (2 of 2) [CW-15947/2019] Hon'ble Court. He further referred the order dated 12.02.2014 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9583/2008, 9582/2008 and 9584/2008 decided by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that the order as mentioned hereinabove is also approved by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal on 09.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the writ petition may be disposed off in light of ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court but a liberty is granted to the Department that in case there is any factual difference about applicability of aforesaid ratio then the Department will consider the same. 4. Having considered aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed off in terms of the judgments in the case of Firoj Arif (supra) and Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal (supra), but in case there is any factual difference or exists any reason to deviate from the ratio, the respondents are at liberty to decide the same with a well-reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid, this present writ petition stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/142