HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32232 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Lal Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for accused-applicants, Sri Sanjay Kumar Rajbhar, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicants- Angad Yadav @ Guddu & Kripashankar Yadav @ Tuwar to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No. 267 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 351(3), 191(3), 3(5) of BNS, P.S.- Kerakat, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicants that the accused applicants have been falsely implicated in FIR dated 29.06.2026 lodged by one of the injured Vikas Rajbhar with the allegation that there was some altercation between the injured informant and Dheeraj Yadav, later on seven named including the accused-applicants and two anonymous persons had assaulted the informant. His father and uncle came to rescue him and they have also been assaulted. It is further contended that four injuries each were suffered by Vikas Rajbhar and Buddhiram Rajbhar. Three injuries suffered by Sudhiram, one is a gunshot injury. All the injuries are stated to be simple in nature in the medico legal examination report. The gunshot injury is assigned to the co-accused Dheeraj. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicants have no criminal history, the ones shown in the instruction are not related to the accused persons. The accused applicants are languishing in jail since 03.07.2026. Hence, seeks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lal Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajeev Kumar Rai, Sanjay Kumar Rajbhar Angad Yadav @ Guddu And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for State have opposed the bail application and submits that the role of accused- applicants are explicit. The statement of other injured has not been filed along with the bail application. Further contended that other injured have specifically named the accused-applicant. There is gun shot injury. The presence of accused-applicants is explicit. Hence, the bail application be rejected. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the nature and number of injuries and the role assigned to the accused applicants, the accused/applicants are entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicants be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicants shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 1, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 32232 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad