APHC010192552009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1421/2009 Between: 1. KAGGA ANKAMA RAO,, S/O. SUBBA RAO, R/O. RETURN VILLAGE, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KAGGA ADILAKSHMI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O. ANKAMMA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 7-20-113,29TH LANE, SARADA COLONY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KAGGA VAISHNAVI, D/O. ANKAMMA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 7-20- 113,29TH LANE, SARADA COLONY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (2ND RESPONDENT BEING MINOR , REP BY HER 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto setaside the order passed in M.C.NO. 253/2008 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 1961 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in M.C.NO. 253/2008 dt.07.07.2009 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur 2 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1421 of 2009 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1421 of 2009 The Court made the following Order: The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against an order, dated 07.07.2009 passed in M.C.No.253 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, Guntur. 2. The brief fact of the matter is that the petitioner was arrayed as a respondent in M.C.No.253 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Guntur under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.. The present respondents 1 & 2 are the petitioners before the learned Trial Court, who claimed maintenance from petitioner – husband. 3. After hearing the parties, the learned Family Court has partly allowed the said Maintenance Case directing the present petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.900/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.600/- per month to the 2nd respondent from the date of the learned Family Court’s order along with other consequential directions. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of maintenance is exorbitant one for the petitioner to pay. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the order of maintenance is Rs.1500/- only and that too the said amount is a very meager one. At this juncture, it is not possible for a person to meet his living expenses for a month with an amount of Rs.1500/-. Consequently, I find no merit in the instant Criminal Revision. 4 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1421 of 2009 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The petitioner is directed to comply the order of the learned Family Court, Guntur. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date:18.09.2026 KPV 5 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1421 of 2009 162 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:1421 of 2009 18.09.2026 KPV