[2026:RJ-JP:29088] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7536/2026 CNR: RJHC020458072026 | URN: CRLMB / 13726U / 2026 Sanwar Singh Rawat S/o Shri Raymal Singh Rawat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Office Bhawanikhera, Ps Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer. (Accused Is In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Ajmer Since 26.04.2026, Arrested On 23.04.2026). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shobit Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. Manga Ram, ASI, Police Station Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 28/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, Ajmer, in Criminal Misc. Case No.501/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2024, Police Station Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer for the offences under Section 419, 420, 406 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. He also submits that the main accused, who was the account [2026:RJ-JP:29088] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7536/2026] holder and proprietor of the alleged firm against whom the allegations of cheating have been made, was Anil Sharma and he has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court vide its order dated 01.11.2025 after remaining in custody for about four months. He also submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than three months. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application and submits that against the petitioner there are three similar cases, which have been reported to be pending. He also submits that the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time, main accused Anil Sharma has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court and further considering the fact that there are three cases pending against the petitioner of similar nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Sanwar Singh Rawat S/o Shri Raymal Singh Rawat arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2024, Police Station Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer, shall be [2026:RJ-JP:29088] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7536/2026] released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. (vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/113