- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8193 WP No. 566 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 566 OF 2026 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD POLICY ISSUING OFFICE 10003, EPIP, SITAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302 022 NOW REP BY M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD NO 5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S.V.R ARCADE, BINALAKALLI MAIN ROAD, BILEKAHALLI OF B.G.ROAD, IIMB POST, BANGALORE-76 REP BY ITS MANAGER LEGAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B C SHIVANNE GOWDA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. J PRATHAP S/O LATE JAYARAMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O INDIRANAGARA, BILAGOLA VILALGE, HESAGAL POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8193 WP No. 566 of 2026 2. MOHAMMED IMRAN S/O MOHAMMED ISMAIL.B, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O 971/1, WARD NO 10, J.M.ROAD, MUDIGERE TOWN AND POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 3/10/2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MUDIGERE IN MVC NO 364/2024 AT ANNEXURE-F ON THE APPLICATION FIELD ORDER 7 RULES 11(D)R/W 151 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AT ANNEXURE-D; B) ALLOW THE APPLICATION NO II FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(D) READ WITH 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE R/W SECTION 166(3) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT AS PER THE ANNEXURE-D IN MVC NO 364/2024 AND HOLD THAT THE CLAIM PETITION IN MVC NO 364/2024 AT ANNEXURE-B FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 1 IS BARRED BY TIME AND IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8193 WP No. 566 of 2026 ORAL ORDER This petition is by the Insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, 'the Act'] in the claim petition in MVC No.364/2024 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mudigere [for short, 'the Tribunal']. If the claimant has filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of the delay in filing the claim petition, the petitioner has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11[d] of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 166[3] of the Act contending that the claim petition is not maintainable because it is filed beyond six months from the date of accident. The Tribunal, by the common impugned order dated 03.10.2025, has allowed the application filed by the claimant rejecting the application filed by the petitioner. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8193 WP No. 566 of 2026 The question: whether a belated claim petition could be entertained condoning the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is pending with the Apex Court in SLP Nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ petition in WP [Civil] No. 166/2024 and connected matters. It remains undisputed that the Apex Court by its interim order dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the Tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized. This Court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the Tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the Apex Court. With this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the Tribunal will refrain from - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8193 WP No. 566 of 2026 pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the Apex Court’s decision on the afore question. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-