Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10955 (PNJ)

SANDEEP AND OTHERS v. AMIT KHATRI

COCP/952/2026 · 2026-04-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[224] Sandeep La Amit Khatr Planning D Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] stands com [2] aforesaid s [3] passed. T However, against the the writ Co [4] disposed of 09.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-952 Date of De eep Lamba and others Versus Khatri, Director General, Town and C ning Department, Sector 18, Chandigar HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Madhur Panwar, Advocate Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, H **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned State C s complied with. Learned counsel for the pe said statement. In view of the above, no fur d. The present contempt petition ever, liberty is granted to the petit nst the speaking order passed in defe rit Court, if so advised. All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 952-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 09.04.2026 …Petitioners and Country ndigarh ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN vocate for the petitioners. (Through V G, Haryana. tate Counsel, submits that the order petitioners does not dispute th no further orders are required to be tition is accordingly disposed off e petitioners to avail his remedies in deference of the order passed by eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ugh V.C.) order ute the to be off. edies ed by tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.10 11:36 I agree to specified portions of this document