PURBANCHAL BUILDTECH PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/3593/2026 · 2026-07-21
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10955 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10955 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010141522026
2026:GAU-AS:9468
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3593/2026 PURBANCHAL BUILDTECH PVT LTD HOUSE NO 2, SEWALI PATH, F.A AHMED NAGAR, SIX MILE, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 781022 REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS SRI BHASKAR GOSWAMI, AGED 45 YEARS, SON OF SRI AMBIKA PAD GOSWAMI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BARGAON, P.O. BIHDIA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781381 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS (BUILDING AND NH) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 06 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (NH WORKS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 781003 3:THE BID EVALUATION COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (NH WORKS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 781003 4:M/S M P AGARWALLA A T ROAD BOKAKHAT TOWN DISTRICT GOLAGHAT
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-785612 5:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN 1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI 110001 6:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) AND SPECIAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS GOVT OF INDIA TRANSPORT BHAWAN 1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI 110001 7:THE REGIONAL OFFICER MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS RAJGARH ROAD CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, MR. R M DEKA,N GAUTAM,MR.
TANUZ KASHYAP Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MRS. R DEVI(C.G.C)R5,6,7,SC, PWD
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 22.07.2026
Shri R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to pursue this writ petition. Also heard Ms. N. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri P. Nayak, learned AAG and Shri K. Gogoi, learned CGC. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Page No.# 3/3 It is needless to mention that there would be no bar to make a challenge in case there is a fresh cause of action. JUDGE Comparing Assistant