( 2026:HHC:21065 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 675 of 2026 Date of decision : 27.05.2026 Piar Chand ...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & others. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. __________________________________________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed alleging non compliance of judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 2984 of 2026, dated 13.03.2026. 3. Earlier the matter was listed in pre-lunch session. 4. The matter was again called at post lunch session. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record communication/office order dated 27.05.2022, as passed by the Managing Director, whereby, representation as filed by the petitioner, has been rejected. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to him to challenge the order dated 27.05.2022. Liberty granted. Ordered accordingly. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:21065( 2026:HHC:21065 ) ) 6. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is accordingly closed with liberty as aforesaid. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma) May 27, 2026 Judge (Veena)