Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10950 (AP)

OMMI HEMANTH KUMAR v. MUDAVATH M NAYAK

CC/1630/2026 · 2026-09-14

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010193312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1630/2026 Between: 1. OMMI HEMANTH KUMAR, S/O.SRI RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,OCC MEDICAL STUDENT, PEDDA STREET, RANGAMPETA, KOTHA SITHARAMPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUDAVATH M NAYAK, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, B.C WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the registry to issue the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 10.12.2025 made in W.P.No. 27801 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOURI BABU DUPPATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. U KANAKA RAJU The Court made the following: 2 SRK, J CC No.1630 of 2026 O R D E R This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents/contemnors for contempt of court for their willful and deliberate disobedience in complying with the Order dated 10.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 27801 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in pursuance of the Order dated 10.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No.27801 of 2025, the respondents/officials have complied with the said order. 3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further orders are required in this Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 15.09.2026. MS / VS 3 SRK, J CC No.1630 of 2026 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No:1630 of 2026 Date: 15.09.2026 MS