[2026:RJ-JP:13358] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1278/2026 Dinesh Kumar Son Of Bhairulal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Chamanganj, Police Station Indragarh, District Bundi (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Jhingonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/03/2026 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that one day prior to the incident, as alleged in the impugned FIR No. 228/2025 registered at Police Station Indergarh, District Bundi, the complainant side caused an incident and fractured one of the hands of the petitioner’s brother for which an FIR No. 227/2025 was registered against them with the Police Station Indergarh, District Bundi for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 118(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Counsel submits that in the instant case i.e. the FIR No. 228/2025, the petitioner has been arrested and he is in custody since 26.12.2025 and after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and the trial will take its own time, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:13358] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1278/2026] 2. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that as per the statements of the injured-Kamla, the petitioner has inflicted an axe blow on her head and the said injury was found to be grievous and dangerous to life. Hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve any indulgence of bail. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that the allegations have been levelled against the petitioner for causing fatal blow on the head of the injured-Kamla and the said injury is found to be grievous and dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to entertain his bail application at this stage. Hence, the same stands rejected. 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after recording of the statement of the injured- Kamla and the treating Doctor, who has given the opinion. The Trial Court is directed to record the statements of the injured- Kamla and the treating Doctor as witness No. 1 and 2 respectively. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Puneet-Shivam/9