1 ( 2026:HHC:21060 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 535 of 2026 Decided on: 02.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Prem Jyoti ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Nalneesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated Nil, alongwith copy of Office Order dated 25.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent/Department vide Office Order dated 25.04.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:21060 ) 2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to assail order 25.04.2026 in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 2nd June, 2026 Judge (raman)