30-WP-1969-2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1969 OF 2021 Hussain Akbarali Virji & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Tanzila Hussain Virji & Anr. ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3178 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1969 OF 2021 Tanzila Hussain Virji ...Applicant Versus Hussain Akbarali Virji & Ors. ...Respondents —————— Ms. Medhavi Dalvi i/b S. Shamim & Co., for the Petitioners. Mr. Tejas Vijaykumar Dhotre, for Respondent No.1. Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J. Date: 22 September 2026 P.C.: 1. Ms. Davli, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Mr. Dhotre, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, state that the dispute between the parties has been settled and that the Consent Terms have been filed in C. C. No. 140/DV/2019 before the learned JMFC, 25th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai. They further state that the said DV case has been disposed of as withdrawn and the proceedings have been closed by the Order dated 13th December 2025 passed by the Lok- Adalat, Mazgaon, Mumbai. Arjun 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.09.23 20:38:54 +0530 30-WP-1969-2021.doc 2. Ms. Dalvi, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, points out the Order dated 21st June 2021 and states that an amount of Rs.1,10,000/- has been deposited in this Court by the Petitioner No.1 pursuant to the said Order. She submits that the said amount be directed to be refunded to Petitioner No.1 along with the accrued interest. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as it has become infructuous. 4. The amount of Rs.1,10,000/- deposited in this Court by Petitioner No.1 pursuant to the Order dated 21st June 2021 is directed to be refunded to Petitioner No.1, along with the accrued interest, if any. 5. As the Writ Petition is disposed of, nothing survives in the Interim Application and the same is also disposed of. [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Arjun 2