Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10936 (BOM)

NAMDEO BALIRAM PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/3052/2026 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903-IA-3052-2026.doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3052 OF 2026 IN REVN/481/2026 Namdev Baliram Patil ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr.Aditya Vijay Sawant a/w Ms.Simran S. Raut, for the Applicant. Mr.S.M. Mangaonkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : . This is an application for suspension of sentence and for bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 3. The Applicant was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pen in Reg. Cri. Case No.63 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Section 420, 468 and 419 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short) and sentenced to suffer rigorous Imprisonment for three years along with fine of Rs.2,000/- and indefault to suffer simple imprisonment of one month. 4. The Applicant was further convicted for the offence punishable 903-IA-3052-2026.doc N.S.Kamble under Section 467 and 471 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous Imprisonment for three years along with fine of Rs.2,000/- and indefault to suffer simple imprisonment of one month. The above sentence is confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibaug. 5. It is contention of the learned counsel for the Applicant that during trial the Applicant was on bail. The Applicant has deposited the fine amount. The Applicant has not misused of the liberty. The sentence imposed on the Applicant is short term sentence and requested to allow the Application. 6. The learned APP strongly objected to allow the Application if the sentence is suspended he may abscond. Hence, requested to reject the Application. 7. Considering the submission of both learned counsel as well as sentence imposed on the Applicant is short term sentence. During trial Applicant was on bail. He has not misused the liberty. Considering these facts, the sentence is suspended till final disposal of the Revision Application. 8. The Application is disposed of in the following terms. ORDER (i) The substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded in Reg. Cri. Case No.63 of 2008 by Judicial Magistrate First 903-IA-3052-2026.doc N.S.Kamble Class, Pen to the applicant is hereby suspended pending disposal of the Revision Application. (ii) The Applicant be released on bail on executing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. (iii) The bail bonds to be furnished before concerned learned Judicial Magistrate, Pen. (iv) The Application is allowed and disposed of. (v) All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)