IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8788 of 2026 Decided on: 02.06.2026 Sh. Ashu Choudhary …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Shivani, Advocte vice Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, the representation of the petitioner dated 12.12.2025, which is appended with the petition as Annexure P-3, is ordered to be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the contents thereof, within some reasonable time. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation filed by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, dated 12.12.2025, be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of three weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 02, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?