Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1093 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA @ SONU S/O MAHAVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3152/2026 · 2026-03-30

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3152/2026 Mahendra @ Sonu S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhinchro Ka Mohalla Sarana, Police Station Sarana, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2867/2026 Mangilal Jat S/o Shri Ramdhan Jat, R/o Bandersindhari, Police Station Bandersindhari, District Ajmer. ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/03/2026 1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No.72/2025 registered at Police Station Sarana, Ajmer for the offence(s) under Section 8/15, 8/18 & 8/20 of NDPS Act and the learned trial court amidst the offences under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act, dismissed the bail applications before it. [2026:RJ-JP:13333] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3152/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submitted that the applicants are young persons. It is submitted that approximately 505 grams of Poppy Husk Powder (Doda Post), 2.025 Kg of Ganja and 1.245 grams of Opium are recovered from the applicants which is less than the prescribed commercial quantity. It is lastly submitted that there is only one criminal antecedent registered against the applicant-Mahendra, under Section 498A of IPC, making it altogether a different antecedent. It is assured that the applicants are ready and willing to join the investigation on 15.04.2026 and render due co-operation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant anticipatory bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that the applicants young persons; that quantity of recovered contraband is less than the prescribed commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant except applicant- Mahendra, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications are allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sarana, Ajmer in FIR No.72/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants- Mahendra @ Sonu S/o Mahaveer and Mangilal Jat S/o Shri Ramdhan Jat, they shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:13333] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3152/2026] Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India with out previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J PARSHANT /32-33