Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1093 (KAR)

NARENDRA H J v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/138/2026 · 2026-03-23

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16294 WP NO.138 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.138 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: NARENDRA H.J. S/O JAYANNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC.: STUDENT, R/AT D. HALASAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA - 571 430. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDAY SHANKAR M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580 025. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. VARADARAJA SCHOOL OF LAW SHETTIHALLI OUTER RING ROAD, JAYANAGARA SOUTH, TUMAKURU - 572 102. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1; SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16294 WP NO.138 OF 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2-KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY TO ISSUE ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE AND APPROVE THE ADMISSION OF THE PETITIONER TO THE THREE YEAR LL.B COURSE FOR THE RELEVANT ACADEMIC YEAR; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE THREE YEAR LL.B COURSE WITHOUT INSISTING UPON COMPLETION OF PUC; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.2-University to issue eligibility certificate and to approve the admission of the petitioner to three year LL.B Course for the relevant academic year; inter alia sought for direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to pursue the three year LL.B Course without insisting upon completion of PUC by the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri. Uday Shankar M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Smt. B. Sukanya Baliga, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1-State; and Smt. Saritha Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2-University. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16294 WP NO.138 OF 2026 3. Smt. Saritha Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2-Univesity opposed the petition by submitting that the petitioner had got certificate from ITI Course, which is not equivalent to 10+2 pattern (Pre-University Certificate) and also the petitioner has not taken up language as a subject in ITI Course. Accordingly, she sought for dismissal of the petition. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the law declared by this Court in case of SHRI. SHAMASUNDAR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER made in Writ Petition No.103653 of 2025 decided on 05th August, 2025, the respondent No.2-Univesity is directed issue eligibility certificate and to approve the admission of the petitioner to the three year LL.B Course. In the result, writ petition is allowed. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67