RAHUL KUMAR RAM ALLIAS RAHUL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3831/2026 · 2026-05-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10925 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10925 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13421 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3831 of 2026 Rahul Kumar Ram @ Rahul Kumar aged about 19 years, son of Raja Ram, Resident of New Police Line, P.O. Gonda, P.S. Gonda, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … ... Opp. Party
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
--------- For the Petitioner: :Mr. Aaryamann Relan, Advocate For the State
:Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P.
--------- 02 /Dated: 06.05.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 08 of 2026 arising out of Nagri P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit, keep the same in the record.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted motorcycle from the informant. It is submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report, without putting him on T.I.Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph 3 of the supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against him, as mentioned in Para 8 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence,
the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XIII-cum- Special Judge-III, CBI (Other than AHD) in connection with S.T. Case No. 08 of 2026 arising out of Nagri P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during the pendency of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 06.05.2026 Uploaded: 07.05.2026
MM/Cp.03