Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10925 (ALL)

RANVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

WPIL/2350/2026 · 2026-09-29

Arun Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2350 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents no.2, 3 and 4 to take all preventive measure for protection of the Daragah, Kheda, Charagah Plot no. 1282 Area 0.2020 + .0810 +3.3080+3.7280= 7.3190 Hec of village Padham (Mustaphabad) Tehsil Jasrana District Firozabad and also get the trespassers evicted from over then land of the aforesaid Daragah, Kheda Charagah and recover then damage from them for their illegal occupation of the aforesaid Daragah, Kheda Charagah." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026, upholding the Coordinate Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niren Kumar Upadhyay, Shiva Kant Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Ranveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) to entertain the instant petition. 5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 Anil WPIL No. 2350 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad