Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/12 GAHC010039092026
2026:GAU-AS:10097
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/130/2026 AKHOY DEKA AND 126 ORS.
S/O. JAIRAM DEKA 2: NABIN CHANDRA DEKA S/O. PADMA RAM DEKA 3: UPEN DEKA S/O. RANGNATH DEKA 4: KALI RAM DEKA S/O. RANGNATH DEKA 5: PRANJAL DEKA S/O. UTTAM CHANDRA DEKA 6: MARAMI DEKA W/O. SONESHWAR DEKA 7: DULAL DEKA S/O. SONARAM DEKA 8: KAUSHYALYA NATH DEKA W/O. DANDESHWAR DEKA 9: GIREN DEKA S/O. SONARAM DEKA 10: HIMALINI DEKA W/O. UPENDRA KUMAR DEKA 11: KNGAKAN KRISHNA DEKA S/O. UPENDRA DEKA 12: SISHU RAM DEKA Page No.# 2/12 S/O. DASHARAM DEKA 13: LAKSHYADHAR DEKA S/O. DASHARAM DEKA 14: KARUNA DEKA S/O. DHARANI DEKA 15: BHOLARAM DEKA S/O. DHARANI DEKA 16: JATIN DEKA S/O. DHARANI DEKA 17: PANKAJ DEKA S/O. KESHAB DEKA 18: MANORANJAN DEKA S/O. KESHAB DEKA 19: AJIT DEKA S/O. SHARAT DEKA 20: SAHARAT DEKA S/O. RANGANATH DEKA 21: KRISHNA DEKA S/O. NIRAM DEKA 22: UMESH DEKA S/O. NIRAM DEKA 23: KHANIN DEKA S/O. BALIN DEKA 24: DHERAJ DEKA S/O. BALIN DEKA 25: KANDARPA DEKA S/O. GHANAKANTA DEKA 26: MANJUR DEKA S/O. NABIN DEKA 27: LOHIT CHANDRA DEKA S/O. PRAFULLA DEKA 28: DIBYA DEKA Page No.# 3/12 W/O. LOHIT CHANDRA DEKA 29: NAGEN CHANDRA DEKA S/O. PRAFULLA DEKA 30: PARESH DEKA S/O. NAREN DEKA 31: SAMBHU RAM DEKA S/O. NAREN DEKA 32: MANJUR DEKA S/O. DRONA RAM DEKA 33: DIPAK CHANDRA DEKA S/O. SARBANANDA DEKA 34: BHUBANESWAR DEKA S/O. CHANDRARAM DEKA 35: MINATI DEKA W/O. RAJANI DEKA 36: SURABHI DEKA W/O. GIRENDRA DEKA 37: MUNINDRA DEKA S/O. CHANDRORAM DEKA 38: DHIREN DEKA S/O. NABIN DEKA 39: BALORAM DEKA S/O. LOKANATH DEKA 40: ARABINDRA DEKA S/O. SATYA RAM DEKA 41: BHADRESHWAR DEKA S/O. HARESHWAR DEKA 42: JOGEN DEKA S/O. KESHAB DEKA 43: DILIP DEKA S/O. NAMALU DEKA 44: GOPAL DEKA Page No.# 4/12 S/O. KALICHARAN DEKA 45: BIJOY CHANDRA DEKA S/O. NIRMALA DEKA 46: UDAY CHARAN DEKA S/O. SANDA RAM DEKA 47: BASANTA DEKA S/O. SANDA RAM DEKA 48: DHARMESHWAR DEKA S/O. RANG NATH DEKA 49: BIPIN DEKA S/O. HARESHWAR DEKA 50: KAMAL DEKA S/O. NAREN DEKA 51: SITARAM DEKA S/O. SATYARAM DEKA 52: BIPIN DEKA S/O. HARADATTA DEKA 53: BHUMIDHAR DEKA S/O. ANANTA DEKA 54: DALIMI DEKA W/O. LANGKESHWAR DEKA 55: KHAGEN DEKA S/O. ANANTA DEKA 56: CHENIRAM DEKA S/O. ANANTA DEKA 57: TARANI DEKA S/O. NAMALU DEKA 58: BHUMIDHAR DEKA S/O. MAHIDHAR DEKA 59: GORGA RAM DEKA S/O. SABHARAM DEKA 60: KAMESWAR DEKA Page No.# 5/12 S/O. PARASHURAM DEKA 61: POKILA DEKA W/O. LOHIT DEKA 62: AMAL DEKA S/O.
HARADATTA DEKA 63: NIRANJAN DEKA S/O. SADHIRAM DEKA 64: SONJAY DEKA S/O. SADHIRAM DEKA 65: KHANIN DEKA S/O. GANESHWAR DEKA 66: ARUP DEKA S/O. GANESHWAR DEKA 67: BHUBANESWAR DEKA S/O. PADMA RAM DEKA PETITIONER NO. 1 TO PETITIONER NO. 67 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. SAHAN P.O. KENDUA P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN.781121 68: KULEN DAS S/O. UPENDRA DAS 69: PRADEEP DAS S/O. UPENDRA NATH DAS 70: JOYKRISHNA DAS S/O. UPEN DAS 71: NIRANJAN SHARMA S/O. GOPAL SHARMA 72: NALINI SHARMA S/O. PRATAP SHARMA 73: NABA KUMAR SARMA S/O. HARIDSEB SARMA
Page No.# 6/12 74: KULASH DEKA S/O. DIBAKAR DEKA 75: PRADIP SARMAH S/O. PRAFULLA CHANDRA SARMAH 76: DINESH RAJBONGSHI S/O. BHOLA RAJBONGSHI 77: KANDARPA RAJBONGSHI S/O. CHINTA RAJBONGSHI 78: PABIN DAS S/O. UPEN DAS 79: RABIN SARMAH S/O. BIREN CHANDRA SARMA 80: GAJIN DAS S/O. CHAKRADHAR DAS 81: NAKUL DAS S/O. HAHIRAM DAS 82: NIRMAL RAJBONGSHI S/O. BIRAHU RAJBONGSHI 83: JAMINI DEKA W/O. MANAMIL DEKA 84: TAPESHWAR DAS S/O. CHAKRADHAR DAS 85: KANAK SHARMA S/O. DHIRESHWAR DAS 86: DIMBESWAR SARMA S/O. GOPAL SARMA 87: NILAMBAR RAJBONGSHI @ NILAMBAR DAS S/O. DANDIRAM RAJBONGSHI 88: ARABINDA SARMA S/O. NARAYAN SARMA 89: KULEN CHANDRA BAISHYA S/O. MUKTA BAISHYA
Page No.# 7/12 90: GOPAL RAJBONGSHI S/O. DANDIRAM RAJBONGSHI 91: HARICHANDRA BARUA S/O. SADHAN BARUA 92: MILAN BARUA S/O. SADHAN BARUA 93: BHUBANESWAR BARUA S/O. MAHENDRA BARUA 94: DILIP SHARMA S/O. GOPAL SHARMA 95: NARESHWAR RAJBONGSHI S/O. LALIT RAJBONGSHI 96: DIPEN SHARMA S/O. GOPAL SHARMA 97: BANITA DEKA W/O. LAKSHADHAR DEKA 98: JAJAMATI DAS W/O. PARASHU RAJBONGSHI 99: GAKUL RAJBONGSHI S/O. DANDIRAM RAJBONGSHI 100: NAKUL DAS S/O. RAM MAL DAS 101: AMARENDRA RAJBONGSHI S/O. UTTAM RAJBONGSHI 102: SACHIN CH. DAS S/O. SAMIN DAS PETITIONER NO.68 TO PETITIONER NO.102 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. AND P.O. KENDUA P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781121 103: MD.
TAHIDUR RAHMAN S/O. MACHUR RAHMAN
Page No.# 8/12 104: MAKIBAR RAHMAN S/O. MACHUR RAHMAN 105: HABIBAR RAHMAN S/O. MACHUR RAHMAN 106: DULAL DEKA S/O. RASAN DEKA 107: TAPAN DEKA S/O. RASAN DEKA 108: MINTUL RAHMAN S/O. SARIF ALI 109: FARIJAN BEGAM W/O. KHORACHAN ALI D/O. GUTLEI SHEIKH 110: NOOR ISLAM S/O. SOFFAD ALI 111: JAMIR ALI S/O. MAHANUR ALI 112: RITU RAJ DEKA PABITRA DEKA PETITIONER NO.103 TO PETITIONER NO. 112 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. JAYANTIPUR P.O. KENDUA P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN.781121 113: SASHINDRA DEKA S/O. BASHAB DEKA 114: MADAN DEKA S/O. BASHAB DEKA 115: NRIPEN DEKA S/O. TARUN DEKA 116: PAYODHAR DEKA S/O. HARENDRA DEKA 117: CHANAKYA DEKA
Page No.# 9/12 S/O. GHANASHYAM DEKA 118: TAPAN DEKA S/O. GHANASHYAM DEKA 119: TRALAKYA DEKA S/O. GHANASHYAM DEKA 120: RAJAT CHANDRA DEKA S/O. KULURAM DEKA 121: DINAMANI DEKA S/O. GHANASHYAM DEKA 122: TARANIKANTA DEKA S/O. GARGARAM DEKA 123: TILAK DEKA S/O. GARGARAM DEKA 124: BHABESH DEKA S/O. GARGARAM DEKA 125: BASHUDHAR DEKA S/O. DEBEN DEKA 126: KSHITISH DEKA S/O. DEBEN DEKA 127: HITESHWAR DEKA S/O. GANORAM DEKA PETITIONER NO.113 TO PETITIONER NO.127 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. PATRAPUR P.O. KENDUA P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN.78112 VERSUS DEBA KUMAR MISHRA, ACS DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP, P.O.- AMINGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 781031
Page No.# 10/12 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.B. Laskar, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Sahiinii, Advocate
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 22.07.2026
Heard Mr. S.B. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. R. Sahiinii, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the sole respondent. 2. The present contempt application has been filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 19.11.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 6361/2025. 3. Taking into account the above, this Court finds it relevant to note the directions issued by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in the order dated 19.11.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 6361/2025 and the relevant paragraphs being Paragraph Nos. 8 and 9 are reproduced hereinbelow:
“8. Having regard to the limited nature of direction sought for in the afore- stated manner and as agreed to by the learned State Counsel, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.
2 to furnish a copy of the application which led to registration of Boundary Case no. 68, to a representative of those petitioners who are claiming to be in possession of parcels of lands of Village – Kendua within a period of 15 days from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order by the petitioners at his office. Page No.# 11/12
9. After receipt of the application pertaining to Boundary Case no. 68, those petitioners can submit their objections/representations within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the application before the respondent no. 2, who in turn, shall give consideration to such objections/representations. It is observed that in Boundary Case no. 68, the respondent no. 4 is to be given an opportunity of hearing during the demarcation proceedings and this order of furnishing a copy of the application is not going to cause any prejudice, this writ petition is disposed dispensing with the process of issuance of a notice to the respondent no. 4.”
4. From a perusal of the above-quoted paragraphs, it is apparent that a direction was issued to the District Commissioner, Kamrup (Rural), to furnish a copy of the application which led to the registration of Boundary Case No.
68. Upon receipt of the said copy, the petitioners were granted the opportunity to file their objection. It was further directed that, upon receipt of such objection, the District Commissioner, Kamrup (Rural), shall consider and decide the same after giving an opportunity of hearing to the respondent No. 4. 5. The present contempt application was filed at the time when the copy of the application which led to the registration of Boundary Case No. 68 was not furnished to the petitioners. It has, however, been brought to the notice of this Court that during the pendency of the present contempt proceedings, the said copy was furnished to the petitioners, pursuant to which the petitioners submitted their objection on 02.07.2026. Page No.# 12/12
6.
Considering that the copy of the application was furnished to the petitioners only during the pendency of the present contempt proceedings and that the petitioners were thereupon able to submit their objection on 02.07.2026, this Court is of the opinion that continuing the present contempt proceedings would not be in the interest of justice. 7. Accordingly, the present contempt application stands dropped. 8. Before parting with the record, this Court, observes that in the circumstance, the objection filed by the petitioners is not taken into consideration and disposed of within a reasonable period, the petitioners would be at liberty to approach this Court alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 19.11.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 6361/2025. JUDGE Comparing Assistant