Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10914 (JHR)

SUNIL KALINDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./80/2026 · 2026-03-13

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6833 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 80 of 2026 Sunil Kalindi, aged about 23 years, son of Arun Kalindi @ Chhotu Kalindi, Resident of Tilamuda, P.O. Asanbani, P.S. Jadugora, District- East Singhbhum … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP --- 03/13.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2025 in connection with Jadugora P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 137(1), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and after investigation chargesheet was submitted and accordingly cognizance was taken under Section 137(1), 96,64(1) of the BNS, 2023 pending in the court of learned ACJM at Ghatsila. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there was love affair between the petitioner and the victim. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that two girls were kidnapped aged about 16 years and 15 years and both of them were recovered from Karnataka and one of them was recovered while she was staying with the petitioner in a room at Malchua, Karnataka. 5. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named is hereby rejected. 6. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 13.03.2026 Uploaded on: 13.03.2026 Binit/