Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010157372020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020
W.P.No.9747 of 2020: Between:
1. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE VEERLA VENKANNA, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO.32/1-A, BANDARKOTA, REVENUE WARD NO.32, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND TAHSILDAR, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. JALDHU RAGHURAM KAUSHIK, S/O. KALYANA RAMA, AGED MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O. D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, EEDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the orders passed by the 2 Respondent in
2
M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020 under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C. are illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the order in M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020 under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C., pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file Counter Affidavit of the 3rd respondent in WP No.9747/2020, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. K VENKATESH W.P.No.10636 of 2020: Between:
1. JALDU RAM KASYAP, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.23 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT,
R/O.D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. JALDU RAGHU RAMA KOUSHIK, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.26 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT,
R/O.D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER JALDU KALYANA RAMA, S/O.LATE JALDU RAMARAO. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
3
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND TAHSILDAR, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.
THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI P.S., KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.VEERLA VENKANNA, R/O.D.NO.23-79-2, RAMANAIDU PETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 5 to implement the order passed by the 3rd respondent in M.C.No.109/2020, dt.1- 6-2020 under Sec.145 of Cr.P.C. in accordance with law by preventing the 6th respondent and his associates from entering and making constructions in the disputed land of an extent of Ac.7.89 cents in R.S.No.127 of Bander East Area of Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District and also direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioners dt.6-6-2020 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
4
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. V SESHA KUMARI The Court made the following:
5
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that these writ petitions became infructuous as the order under Section 145 Cr.P.C is passed on 01.06.2020. Recorded the said submission. In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
Dt:23.09.2026 Vns