SHOBHIT JOSHI @ SANDRAB JOSHI SON OF LATE SHRI PRAMOD JOSHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5093/2023 · 2026-07-22
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10907 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10907 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:28215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5093/2023 URN: CRLMP / 9853U / 2023 Shobhit Joshi @ Sandrab Joshi Son of Late Shri Pramod Joshi, aged about 43 Years, Resident of H 33 B, Gautam Marg, Jan Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) At Present Resident of Central Jail, Jaipur, Ghatgate, Jaipur at present on Parole. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent
2. Ramcharan, Deputy Jailor, Oper Air Camp Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 22/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned F.I.R. No.292/2023 registered at the Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur for the offence punishable under Section 224 IPC. 2. It has been averred in the instant petition that the mobile phone of the petitioner was hacked by an unknown hacker and after doing the same, certain threat messages were sent and on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the impugned F.I.R. has been registered against the petitioner. It has also been averred that the petitioner has never sent any threat message to anyone
[2026:RJ-JP:28215] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5093/2023] and he has been falsely booked in the instant case, hence, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned F.I.R.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that after thorough investigation in the present matter, prima facie case has been found to be proved against the petitioner under Sections 384 & 506 IPC and charge-sheet has already been submitted against him before the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magsitrate No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan-II on
28.10.2024. Counsel submits that under these circumstances, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5.
Perusal of the contents of the impugned F.I.R. and the allegations levelled therein reveal commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of the allegations cannot be examined by this Court by conducting roving and fishing enquiry to find out the truth behind the allegations under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer, who has already found prima facie case against the petitioner after thorough investigation in the present matter and charge- sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 384 & 506 IPC. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to take all the available grounds, which have been taken before this Court and available
[2026:RJ-JP:28215] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5093/2023] defence at the appropriate stage of the trial, before the Trial Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 8. The factual report dated 24.01.2025 received from the Station House Officer, Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (East) is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/43