Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10900 (PNJ)

BALINDER AND OTHERS v. DR. RATAN TIWARI

COCP/5515/2025 · 2026-04-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[214] Balinder an Dr. Ratan T (Indian Cou Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] passed by t the petition [2] The presen [3] disposed of 09.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-551 Date of De der and others Versus atan Tiwari, Director of Wheat Resear Council of Agriculture Research), K HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocate Mr. Ravi Dobriyal, Chief Adm Officer in person. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent ha d by the Chief Admin. Officer, where etitioners has been disposed off. The s In view thereof, no further ord present contempt petition is disposed o All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 5515-2025 (O&M) of Decision : 09.04.2026 …Petitioners Research rch), Karnal. ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN vocate with ef Administrative ent has produced copy of the Order whereby the representation made by The same is taken on record. her orders are required to be passed. osed off. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Order de by ssed. tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.10 14:11 I agree to specified portions of this document