DHANI RAM SOREN ALIAS NEPALI ALIAS DHANI RAM SORREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1583/2026 · 2026-03-16
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1090 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1090 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6993
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1583 of 2026
--------- Dhani Ram Soren @ Nepali @ Dhani Ram Sorren aged about 40 years son of Mahadeo Manjhi, resident of village-Khapia Karmabeda, P.O. and P.S. Charhi, District-Hazaribag.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-16.03.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 310(2) of B.N.S., 2023 in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 184/2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has also not been identified by the informant and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that one co-accused person namely-Vikash Kumar has already been granted bail in B.A. No. 1998 of 2026 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 22.11.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the co-accused has already been granted bail and that the petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 184/2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) March 16, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 17.03.2026