Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 109 (JK)

MUSKAN MEHRA NOW MUSKAN MALIK v. UT OF J AND K TH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATHUA AND OTHERS

WP(C)/786/2026 · 2026-04-01

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 786/2026 Muskan Mehra nor Muskan Malik …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Nikhil Padha, Advocate [Through Virtual Mode] Ms. Anamika Gupta, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (01.04.2026) 01. Mr. Nikhil Padha, learned counsel for the petitioner when confronted with the documents which have been placed on record, have been attested by him without seeing the original documents, seeks withdrawal of the instant petition. However, he undertakes that henceforth, if any, document is attached with the writ petition which is likely to be filed by him, the same will be attested after properly verifying from the original. 02. In light of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn without commenting upon the merits of the case. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 01.04.2026 Vijay S. No. 117 Vijay Kumar 2026.02.12 20:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document