223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-529-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.03.2026 Narender Mann ... Petitioner Versus Savita Pannu, Executive Engineer, Provisional Division, B&R Panipat ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Panwar, Addl. AG Haryana. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. This is a petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of proceedings against the respondent for violation of the order dated 24.04.2025 passed in CWP-5522-2025. 2. The compliance report by way of affidavit of Sh. Savit Kumar Pannu, Executive Engineer, Provisional Division, PWD B&R, Panipat has been filed by learned State counsel, which is taken on record. Registry to scan the same and tag at the appropriate place. It has categorically been stated in the compliance report that a total amount of ₹61,44,055/- has been received by the petitioner and that the bill payment of balance 50% security i.e. ₹11,81,276/- has been prepared and submitted to the Treasury vide bill No.382 dated 02.03.2026 (Annexure R-6). Learned State counsel states that in view JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.10 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh COCP-529-2026 -4- of the compliance report, the order dated 24.04.2025 passed in CWP-5522- 2025 has been complied with in letter and spirit. 3. In view of the compliance report, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 4. Needless to say that if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he would always be at liberty to avail his remedies as available in law. 09.03.2026 jk ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.10 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh