APHC010318032026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 17820 OF 2026 Between: 1. SRI SATYA ELECTRICAL WORKS, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Vurum Madhavi, W/o Late. Vurum Lingaiah Devera, R/o D.No.17-6-22, Veerraju Master Street, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema Dt., (Erstwhile East Godavari District) 533201 2. Vurum Madhavi, W/o Late. Vurum Lingaiah Devera, Aged about 46 years, R/o D.No.17-6-22, Veerraju Master Street, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema DisWrt. . (Erstwhile East Godavari District) 533201 ...Petitioners AND 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, Ramachandrapuram Branch, D.No.22-3-22/6, - Surya Cinemax Complex, Opposite Old Bus Stand Ramachandrapuram - 533 255, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. (Erstwhile East Godavari District) 533201 2. The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh 530001 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction more particularly one 2 in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order passed in LA.No. 2220 of 2026 in S.A.No.537 of 2025 by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Visakhapatnam without granting stay order of all further proceedings of the Authorized Officer initiated section 14 proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 on the file of the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram till the disposal of S.A.No.537 of 2025 of DRT, Visakahapatnam is illegal, arbitrary and unjust as well as violation of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and also violation principles of natural justice and quash the impugned order and allow the writ petition by granting stay orders to stay all further proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 on the file of the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram till the disposal of S.A.No.537 of 2025 of DRT, Visakahapatnam' and consequently to direct the 2ND respondent to decide the S.A.No.537 of 2025 along with pending LA's as per SARFAESI Act, 2002 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings stay order of all further proceedings of the Authorized Officer initiated section 14 proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 on the file of the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate- cum-Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram till the disposal of S.A.No.537 of 2025 of DRT, Visakahapatnam and also proposed taking physical possession of the property/secured asset i.e., Residential RCC Building and Ground floor, 1ST and 2ND floors is situated in an extent of 295.55 square yards D.No. 17-6-22, R.S.No.478/1 and 480/1, Ward No. 10, Block No. 17, Veeraju Master Street, Rannachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District (Erstwhile East Godavari District) through an Advocate Commissioner appointed by the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate- cum-Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajamahendravaram in 3 Crl.M.P.No.261 of 2026 during the pendency of this writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU Counsel for the Respondents: V DYUMANI The Court made the following order: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO.17820 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) During the course of hearing of this case today, Ms. V. Dyumani, learned counsel for the respondent Bank, would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of the writ petition that the loan account is closed after clearing the entire dues by the petitioners, no cause survives in the present writ petition. 2) Placing the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent bank on record. 3) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4) There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 16.09.2026 PGR 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA W.P.No.17820 of 2026 Dt. 16.09.2026 PGR