NIRMALA AND ANOTHER v. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS
A227/13792/2026 · 2026-09-30
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10892 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10892 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13792 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 14, Azamgarh to decide 6-C2 application filed in Case No. 866 of 2026.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C2, in case, the same is pending consideration in Case No. 866 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Nirmala And Another .....Petitioner(s) Raj Bahadur Yadav And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad