2026:JHHC:756 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.49 of 2026 ----- Panchu Narhiya, S/o Late Madan Narhiya, R/o Village- Bendosera, P.O Orga, P.S. Jaldega, District- Simdega .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary/ Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, having office at MDI Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & PS Dhurwa, Town and District Ranchi 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Simdega, having office at P.O., P.S & District Simdega 3.The District Superintendent of Education, Simdega, having office at P.O, P.S. & District- Simdega 4.The Block Education Extension Officer, Jaldega, having office at P.O. and PS Jaldega, District- Simdega 5.The Chairman-cum-President, Village Education Committee, Govt. of Primary School, Bendosera, P.O. Bendosera, P.S. Jaldega, District Simdega … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Parul Parasar, AC to GA-I …...... 04/ 13.01.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for salary from October, 2015 to August, 2016 and April, 2008 to March, 2010 during the period, which the petitioner actually worked and also the salary to the petitioner from September, 2016 to February, 2023 during the period, the petitioner was kept out of service due to termination. 3. The petitioner was Para-teacher and he along with one National Bage was terminated from service. The petitioner approached this Court by filing writ petition being W.P.(S) No.6023 of 2016 challenging the order of termination. This Court heard the petitioner and respondents and thereafter vide order dated 10.11.2022 allowed the writ petition by setting aside, the order of termination. This Court also held that the petitioner shall be granted the benefit of continuity in service and be paid the salary for the period they have actually worked. Thus, this Court has already passed an order in respect of salary of the petitioner and which is quite clear and is not ambiguous. The petitioner is making the same prayer here again. Thus, in my opinion, this writ petition is not maintainable when already this Court had passed an order in respect of salary. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13th January, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 14 /01/2026.