- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12700 CRL.P No. 9862 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9862 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. K. NEELAVENI W/O. LATE SRI R KESHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.916, 7TH MAIN ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560021 2. SMT. K. VANITA D/O LATE SRI R KESHAVAN, W/O. SRI ANNADURAI M, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.114/1 57/1, PERUMAL KOIL STREET KOTTUR, NEAR PRASANA VINAYAKA TEMPLE, KOTTURPURAM, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU-600085 3. SRI. UDAY KUMAR S/O SRI ANNADURAI M, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT NO.916/52, 7TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, PRAKASH NAGAR, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12700 CRL.P No. 9862 of 2024 BENGALURU-560021 4. SRI. KOWSHIK S/O SRI K GANESH MODALI, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/AT NO.11-10, 1ST STREET, NEWPET, LAL BAHADUR NAGAR, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517408 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU, RAJAJINAGAR POLICE STATION, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU CITY. 2. SMT. RAJAVISHALINI D W/O K JAYAPRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.115, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, OKALIPURAM, BENGALURU -560021 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12700 CRL.P No. 9862 of 2024 THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.14352/2022 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXXIX ACMM, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES U/S 327, 448, 504, 506 AND 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The subject petition is preferred on 22.08.2024. Long before the said date, it transpires that the charges have already been framed before the concerned Court and the trial is in progress. 2. Therefore, when the matter is at the stage of evidence, the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1, has clearly held that this Court in exercise 1 (1994) 4 SCC 142 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12700 CRL.P No. 9862 of 2024 of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. should not entertain those petitions. 3. Leaving open to the petitioners to urge all the contentions that are urged in the subject petition before the concerned Court at the appropriate time, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7