KARAN KUMAR MANDAL ALIAS MURARI MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11828/2025 · 2026-02-04
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2934
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 11828 of 2025
-----
Karan Kumar Mandal @ Murari Mandal, S/o Gango Mandal, R/o Village- Budhiya Sarai, P.O.-Tiklato, P.S.-Bengabad, Dist.-Giridih
… …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… …. Opp. Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Gupa, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
----- Oral Order
02 / Dated : 04.02.2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner named above has been made accused in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022 for the offence registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of C.J.M., Giridih.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has once escaped from the police custody and when the police went to arrest him, the petitioner and others assaulted the police party, including a lady constable, who were injured in the incident.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that other co- accused has been granted bail.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner has criminal antecedent and a flight risk and, therefore, his case does not stand on a similar footing.
Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the prosecution, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra Uploaded 05.02.2026