Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10877 (KAR)

SMT A MANJULA v. SRI RAVIKIRAN S K

WP/5856/2025 · 2026-02-12

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8712 WP No. 5856 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 5856 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SMT. A. MANJULA D/O PAPAMMA AND ANNAYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT HULIMAVU VILLAGE AND POST, BANNERAGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH M.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GIRISH, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. RAVIKIRAN S.K S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. R/AT SAMETHANAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8712 WP No. 5856 of 2025 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04/11/2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN M.C. NO.297/2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU ANNEXURE-E AND AFTER PERUSING THE RECORDS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS BY CALLING THE SAME FROM THE RESPECTIVE COURT, AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASHING AN ORDER DATED 4/11/2024 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN M.C. NO.297/2021 AND PLEASED TO ENHANCE THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8712 WP No. 5856 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri. Ramesh M.S representing Sri.Girish learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Memo to that effect is also filed. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52