SMT SUSHMA SINGH AND 75 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/16104/2026 · 2026-09-30
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10871 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10871 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16104 of 2026
Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), learned counsel for the respondent-BSA as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners, who are 76 in number, have approached this Court with the following prayers:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant first increment of salary to the petitioners on 1st January, 2017 and further annual increments on 1st January of each year and to revise their salaries accordingly and to pay the revised salaries to the petitioners in accordance with Rule 10(1) Illustration (b) of the (CCS Revised Pay) Rules, 2016, Clause 8 Illustration (Kha) of the Government Order dated 22.12.2016 and letter of the Finance Controller dated 20.11.2025. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the arrears of salaries to the petitioners on account of grant of first increment on 1st January, 2017 and revision of salary with interest as may be specified by this Honble Court. III. Issue, writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IV. Award cost of the petition to the petitioner."
3. The issue in question has already been decided by this Court in Writ A No.481 of 2026, (Seema Ray and 3 Others vs. State of UP and 5 Others), decided on 24.08.2026. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the individual representations, if any, submitted by the petitioners, specifically indicating their respective Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Man Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), C.S.C. Smt Sushma Singh And 75 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
dates of appointment, dates of joining, and the circumstances in which they could not join on the first day of the relevant month.
Upon receipt of such representations, the competent authority shall examine the claim of each petitioner in the light of the statutory provisions, the applicable Government Orders and the observations made by this Court in Seema Ray (supra), and shall pass a reasoned and speaking order, dealing with the individual claim of each petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. October 1, 2026 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 16104 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad