Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1087 (MAD)

S.SHAKILA v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/44757/2025 · 2026-04-01

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:1341 WP No. 44757 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 44757 of 2025 and WMP Nos. 49943, 49947 & 49949 of 2025 S.Shakila ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector Office, Vengikkal Village and Post, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. 2. The Assistant Director, O/o.The Assistant Director Office, Vengikal Village and Post, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Collectorate of Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. 3. The Block Development Officer, O/o. The Block Development Office, Chengam Town and Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records connected with the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent herein vide in Na.Ka.Va. A2/ 246/ 2024 dated 10.10.2025 and quash the same and direct https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44757 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 the 1 to 3 Respondents herein, permit the petitioner to continue the Petty or Bunk Shop in the compound of the 3rd Respondents office of the Block Development Office, Chengam Town and Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District after considering the petitioner’s representation dated 15.10.2025. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2 , Mr.T.Chezhiyan, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that after affording opportunity to the petitioner the Bunk shop illegally erected was removed. 2. That being the submission, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44757 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector Office, Vengikkal Village and Post, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. 2. The Assistant Director, O/o.The Assistant Director Office, Vengikal Village and Post, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Collectorate of Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. 3. The Block Development Officer, O/o. The Block Development Office, Chengam Town and Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District- 606 604. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44757 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.SURENDER J. DSA WP No. 44757 of 2025 01-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis