RAKESH GIRI ALIAS RAKESH KUMAR GIRI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3701/2026 · 2026-05-04
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10869 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10869 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:13159 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3701 of 2026
------ Rakesh Giri @ Rakesh Kumar Giri, aged about 25 years, Son of Ramesh Giri, Resident of Sanjay Path, Laxman Nagar, Road No.6, Near Kali Mandir, P.O. and P.S. –Olidih, Mango, Town –Jamshedpur, District –East Singhbhum, (Jharkhand).
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 04.05.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Olidih P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 and 25(6) of the Arms Act
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused –Akash Giri beat Ritesh Kumar Singh and Akash Giri took out a double barrel Desi Katta from his waist and assaulted Ritesh Kumar Singh from the butt of the pistol on his head. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the allegation of keeping firearm is upon Akash Giri. It is next submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner of being in possession of any firearm. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrarte -1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Olidih P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
04.05.2026
Sonu/