Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
48 Nms-961-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 961 OF 2017 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 276 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO. 301 OF 2017 WITH SUIT NO. 301 OF 2017 Ursula Thakkar ...Plaintiff Vs. Charita Hemmady And 6 Ors. ...Defendants ***** Adv. Tanvi Darji i/by Induslaw Advocate for the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 ***** CORAM :
S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE :
22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C. :-
1. Plaintiff is granted four weeks time to bring the subsequent events on record. It is true this Court on 10.04.2017 passed an order in Notice of Motion No. 621 of 2017 and recorded an undertaking of the learned advocate for the defendants that nobody will interfere with the possession of the plaintiff. It is further recorded in para no. 2 that “Mr. Narichania states that plaintiff should be entitled to access the third Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2026.09.24 14:22:53 +0530
48 Nms-961-2017.doc floor also. At the same time, it should be noted that plaintiff resides in Singapore and visits Mumbai regularly”.
2. With this undertaking, the matter was adjourned for filing replies. Replies are ready. This motion is pending for more than nine years.
3. So let that arrangement be continued till disposal of the suit.
With this arrangement, Notice of Motion is disposed of.
4. If Plaintiff wants to press for other reliefs in Notice of Motion, he is at liberty to file necessary application.
5. Stand over to 13th October 2026.
[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2