Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10864 (CHH)

KEKTI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/14153/2025 · 2026-01-05

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:579 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 14153 of 2025 1 - Kekti Yadav W/o Bhupesh Kumar Yadav Aged About 32 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Purnapani, Block Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. 2 - Ritu Dhruw W/o Uttam Kumar Dhruw Aged About 31 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Purnapani, Block Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. 3 - Kalpana Thakur W/o Jageshwar Prasad Aged About 27 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Kendupura, Block Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. 4 - Babita Thakur W/o Suraj Kumar Bariha Aged About 27 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Uparpita, Block Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. 5 - Ghanshyam Kanwar S/o Kartik Ram Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Dumarpita, Block Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Joint Director Cum Secretary, Education Department, Division Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - District Education Officer Cum Secretary, District Rationalization Committee, District Gariyaband C.G. --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 06/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file better constituted petition. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram