Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10861 (BOM)

BHASKAR CHAGANRAO SURYWANSHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

CP/17/2009 · 2026-09-22

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2009 IN WP/2713/2007 BHASKAR CHAGANRAO SURYWANSHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Adv. M. L. Paithane a/w Adv. Prajakta Misal h/f Adv. A. S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) . The order of which the contempt is alleged was an interim order passed in writ petition. Subsequently, this Court has disposed of the writ petition vide order dated 10.04.2014. 2. In view of disposal of the writ petition itself, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43382