MUKESH KUMAR ALIAS MUKESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11653/2025 · 2026-03-16
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10855 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10855 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:7018 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11653 of 2025
--------- Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav, aged about 29 years, son of Gulab Saw, resident of Village Pannagarh, Ara, P.O. and P.S. Balumath, District Latehar.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P.
--------- 04/ 16.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 324(5), 324(6), 326(f), 308(5), 111(4), 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner was remanded in this case on 17.09.2025 only on the basis of confessional statement which was recorded in another case i.e. Balumath P.S. Case No. 94/2025. Learned counsel further submits that no T.I.P. was done. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 17.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner and the period of custody of the petitioner; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Meenakshi Mishra, learned
2026:JHHC:7018 2 Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 33 of 2025.
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 16th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 17.03.2026