Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10850 (MAD)

Aravind v. The State, rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/10137/2026 · 2026-04-22

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 1.Aravind 2. Venkatesan ... Petitioners Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. Crime No.60 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.60 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Santhiya For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 and Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.60 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners was found in illegal transportation of 1 unit of river sand. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners got one similar previous case. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners have similar previous case, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioners does not deserve anticipatory bail. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 22.04.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.10137 of 2026 22.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis