Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026: JHHC:8944-DB)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 112 of 2024
1. Sidhinath Pandey, aged about 81 years,
2. Dharamdeo Pandey, aged about 76 years, Both sons of Late Samol Pandey, residents of Village & PO: Pandu, P.S. Bishrampur (now Pandu), District- Palamau ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Commissioner, Palamau Division, PO & PS: Daltonganj, District- Palamau
3. Deputy Commissioner, Medininagar, PO & PS: Daltonganj, District- Palamau
4. Additional Collector, Medininagar, PO & PS: Daltonganj, District- Palamau
5. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Medininagar, PO & PS: Daltonganj, District- Palamau
6. Circle Officer, Bishrampur(now Pandu), PO & PS: Bishrampur(now Pandu), District-Palamau
7. Rajpatiya Devi, widow of Late Rattu Mahto
8. Nagendra Mahto,
9. Guddu Mahto @ Lalendra Mahto, both sons of Late Rattu Mahto 7 to 9 are residents of Village- Pandu, Tola Burikhar, PO & PS: Pandu, District- Palamau
10. Sushila Devi, daughter of Late Rattu Mahto, wife of Yugal Mahto, resident of Village- Bhatwalia, PO & PS: Pandu, District Palamau
11. Rampati Kuar, widow of Late Bhagwanbali Mahto
12. Hariduar Mahto,
13. Lav Kush Mahto,
14. Bikarma Mahto, 12 to 14 are sons of Late Bhagwanbali Mahto 11 to 14 are residents of Village- Pandu, Tola Burikhar, PO & PS: Pandu, District- Palamau
15. Rita Devi, wife of Bigan Mahto and daughter of Late Bhagwanbal Mahto, resident of Jharnava, PO: Danta, PS & District- Garhwa
16. Anita Devi, wife of Bishesh Kumar Mahto and daughter of Late Bhagwanbali Mahto, resident of Village- Chapia, PO: Kutmu, PS: Pandu, District- Palamau
17. Janeshwar Mahto, son of Late Prabhu Mahto, resident of Village & PO: Pandu, Tola Burikhar, PS: Bishrampur (now Pandu), District- Palamau
18. Bala Mahto, son of Late Deochand Mahto,
(2026: JHHC:8944-DB)
2
19. Raj Kumar Mahto, son of Late Radha Mahto, both are residents of Village & PO- Pandu, Tola Burikhar, PS: Bishrampur (now Pandu), District Palamau
20. Santosh Kumar Mehta, son of Late Deoraj Mahto, resident of Village Pandu, Tola Budhikhand, PO & PS: Pandu, District Palamau
21. Salo Devi, wife of Ramjavit Mehta, daughter of Late Deoraj Mahto, resident of Village Bhaduma, PO: Pachpadwa, PS & District Garhwa
22. Basanti Devi, wife of Narad Mahto, daughter of Late Deoraj Mahto, resident of Village- Silidag, PO: Ramuna, PS: Ramuna, District-Garhwa
23. Urmila Devi, wife of Satan Mahto, daughter of Late Deoraj Mahto,
24.
Nirmal Devi, widow of Late Narad Mahto, daughter of Late Deoraj Mahto, both are residents of Village- Madgadi, PO: Kanjiya, PS: Bhandaria, District- Garhwa. 25. Ananta Devi, wife of Sanjaya Mahto, daughter of Late Deoraj Mahto, resident of Village, PO & PS: Meral, District- Garhwa
26. Ram Sagar Mahto,
27. Rajendra Mahto,
28. Sudama Mahto,
29. Girija Mahto, No. 26 to 29 are sons of Late Harihar Mahto, 26 to 29 are residents of Village & PO- Pandu, Tola Burikhar, PS: Bishrampur (now Pandu), District- Palamau ... Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the O.P.-State: Mr Ratnesh Kumar, S.C (L&C)-I Mr Rakesh Kumar Shahi, AC to SC(L&C)-1
---------
Order No. 05/Dated: 30.03.2026
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that our order disposing of the I.A. No. 10611 of 2024 in Civil Review No. 105 of 2024 will govern the fate of this matter.
2. In fact, we note that in the previous matter, the delay was of 507 days and in this case, the delay is 545 days.
(2026: JHHC:8944-DB)
3
3. The parties in the two matters are also the same. Therefore, by applying the reasoning in our order disposing of the I.A. No. 10611 of 2024 in Civil Review No. 105 of 2024, we dispose of this matter. I.A. No. 10610 of 2024 is dismissed.
4. Consequently, this review petition is dismissed, and any other I.As. therein will not survive and are disposed of.
(M. S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.) March 30, 2026 N.A.F.R. Ranjeet/Cp.2 Uploaded on 01.04.2026