Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10843 (JHR)

BADRI NATH ROY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1402/2025 · 2026-02-06

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1402 of 2025 Badri Nath Roy, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Habu Babu Roy, Resident of J.C. Mallick Road, Near Pragati Enclave Apartment, Hirapur, P.O.- Hirapur, P.S.- Dhanbad. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Samiran Dutta, son of not known, Chairman cum Managing Director, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, office at Koyala Bhawan, P.O.- Koyala Nagar, Dist.- Dhanbad. 3. Mr. Binit Kumar Sinha, son of not known, The Senior Manager, Personnel, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koyla Nagar, P.O.- Koyla Nagar, P.S.- Saraidhela, Dist.- Dhanbad. 4. Kumari Shweta, The Deputy Manager (Personnel), Central Hospital, P.O.- Jagjiwan Nagar, P.S.- Saraidhela, Dist.- Dhanbad. 5. Rajesh Kumar Thakur, Son of not known, The Chief of Medical Services, Central Hospital, P.O.- Jagjiwan Nagar, P.S.- Saraidhela, Dist.- Dhanbad … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kishore, Advocate For the State : Mr. Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, AC to SC-VII For the BCCL : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate : Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate --- 06/06.02.2026 Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This contempt petition has been filed praying for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties including opposite party no. 3 alleging intentional, willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order dated 25.08.2025 passed by this Court in Cont. Case (Civil) No. 605 of 2024. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied. 4. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the statutory interest on gratuity has not been paid to the petitioner. 5. Considering the nature of the order, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceedings. However, if there is any statutory interest payable, it will be open to the petitioner to take steps as per law. 2026:JHHC:3235 2 6. This contempt petition is accordingly dropped. 7. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of order: 06.02.2026 Date of uploading:11.02.2026 Pankaj