2026:JHHC:13355 --1-- A.B.A. No. 2050 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2050 of 2026 ---- Rajpal Singh @ Goldy @ Goldy Singh @ Rajpal Singh Goldy, aged about 40 years, son of Late Jagdish Singh, resident of Munda Colony, Manifit, PO and PS – Telco, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Lily Sahay, Advocate ---- 02/05.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Birsa Nagar P.S. Case No.88 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Section 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement. He further submits that even firing has not been made by the petitioner pursuant to that the glass window of classroom has been pierced. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 2026:JHHC:13355 --2-- A.B.A. No. 2050 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there that the petitioner was accomplice of the persons, who have fired on the second floor of the building in which H.B.C.S.E. coaching centre was situated and due to said firing open glass window broken and one Akash Tiwari, who was teaching the students, have received the injury. She further submits that the petitioner is having five criminal antecedents and the petitioner is not cooperating in the investigation. 5. The allegation in the FIR was there of firing upon the said coaching institute and pursuant to that Akash Kumar has received the injury and the petitioner is said to be accomplice, however, the name of the petitioner has come on confessional statement and further the petitioner is having five criminal antecedents. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 05.05.2026 Sangam/