Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10831 (ALL)

NEETU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/16069/2026 · 2026-09-30

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16069 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Mohit Dixit, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Kaushlesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the Respondent no.3 District Basic Education Officer Farrukhabad to pay honorarium to the petitioner along with arrears w.e.f 23.3.2026 for the post of Shiksha Mitra, within stipulated period, as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writs, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet ends of justice. iii. Award cost of this writ petition to the petitioner." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been appointed as Shiksha Mitra in accordance with the procedure prescribed under law, however, honorarium w.e.f. 23.03.2026 is not being paid to the petitioner. In this regard, she has moved a representation before respondent no. 3, but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to decide the same in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case petitioner moves a fresh representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Ratnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushlesh Pratap Singh Neetu Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; District Basic Education Officer, Farrukhabad, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 1, 2026 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 16069 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad