Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10828 (AP)

JAMAL AHMED KHAN MOHAMMAD v. SHAIK JEENATH TARA

CRP/2983/2019 · 2026-09-18

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 AHHS,J C.r.P.No. 2983 of 2019 Dated 19.09.2026 APHC010333422019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2983 OF 2019 Between: 1. JAMAL AHMED KHAN MOHAMMAD, REPRESENTED HIS GPA AGENT, MD.ABUBAKAR RAHAMTULLAH KHAN, S/O.MAHABOOB KHAN, MUSLIM, AGED 66 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO. 11-1-37, SAYED DAWOOD, JAMEDAR STREET, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHAIK JEENATH TARA, W/o. Shaik.Mohammed, Muslim, Aged 53 Years, House Wife, R/o.D.No.11-1-33, Sayed Dawood Jamedar Veedhi, Ongole Town and Mandal, Prakasam District. PIN 523001. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKATESWARLU CHAKKILAM The Court made the following: 2 AHHS,J C.r.P.No. 2983 of 2019 Dated 19.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2983 OF 2019 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Case (for short “C.R.P”) is directed against the order in I.A.No.1267 of 2019 in I.A.No.571 of 2013 in O.S.No.290 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2. I.A.No. 1267 of 2019 was filed under Order XXVI, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking to re-direct the Advocate – Commissioner to measure the property of petitioner and respondent, adjacent west of petitioner’s property with the assistance of Divisional Surveyor. Said application was allowed. 3. Questioning the said order, the present C.R.P., has been preferred. 4. The case status information discloses that the suit in O.S.No. 290 of 2013 has already been dismissed on 27.04.2026. Therefore, no cause survives. 5. No representation from either side. 6. In view of the above reasons, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _______________________________________ SRI JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Dated 19.09.2026 KS Whether the order is : Speaking: Yes Reasoned : Yes Reportable: No Non-Reportable: Yes 3 AHHS,J C.r.P.No. 2983 of 2019 Dated 19.09.2026 51 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2983 OF 2019 Dated:19.09.2026. KS