Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10821 (CHH)

BHUNESHWAR PRASAD BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/753/2026 · 2026-03-15

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12370 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 753 of 2026 1 - Bhuneshwar Prasad Banjare S/o Shankar Lal Banjare Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Parsapali, P.S. Lavan, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Department of Minerals, Collector Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 16 / 03 / 2026 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, against the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Balodabazar, District – Balodabazar (C.G.) in Criminal Case No. 41/2026, whereby the application preferred under Section 497 of BNSS read with Section 71(4) of Mines and Minerals Act and C.G. Minor and Minerals Rules 2015 has been rejected. HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.03.16 16:43:49 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before appropriate Court. He prays to return the certified copy of the impugned order. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to this proposition put fourth by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the counsel for the petitioner, after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu