Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10813 (AP)

Swarna Suryaprakasha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/19060/2020 · 2026-09-22

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010288882020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19060/2020 Between: 1. SWARNA SURYAPRAKASHA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MADDIRALAPADU VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALA MANDAL, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE RURAL POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 in giving effect to the mandatory precaution laid down in Section 17 of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 r/w The Amended Act, 2015 and in not giving effect to the representation of the petitioner dated 03- 02-2020 addressed to the respondents 2 and 3 herein as being opposed to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 respondents to take preventive action as contemplated under the provisions of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 and the Rules framed therein along with the Indian Penal Code and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to act upon the representation of the petitioner dated 03-02-2020 addressed to the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein without further delay so as to protect the lawful rights of the petitioner over the property admeasuring Ac.8-27 cts situated in Sy.No.58/1 RU of Maddiralapadu Village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V V A PRASANNAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19060/2020 ORDER: 1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On the last adjournment i.e., 15.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition. 2. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 23.09.2026 CJP 4 60 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19060/2020 Date: 23.09.2026 CJP