HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9577 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of seven cases, which has not been explained in the affidavit accompanying the present anticipatory bail application, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 2. On being confronted with this fact, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with the liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after disclosing the complete criminal antecedents of the applicant, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the above mentioned liberty. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy, if any, filed along with the bail application to the Learned counsel for the applicant. September 30, 2026 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Satendra @ Bobby .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad